Microsoft Mis-Steps on Inknowectual Property

Microsoft Mis-Steps on Inknowectual Property

A contest that was purported to highlight Britain through "recommfinishing" pictures that are not your own has turned into a black eye for the good folks at Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT). In reality, the program was really designed to get people familiar with Microsoft's "Live Search" operateality. I say "good folks" because they've been worlord difficult to improve their positive visibility in the past few years, with the Microsoft Pro Photo Summit, Microsoft Icons of Imaging, photographers more reasonable fees for licentune of pictures for Vista, and their soon-to-be-released PhotoSynth promises to redefine the ground, soilscape of photography - literally. Yet, the Microsoft's Iconic Britain has raised the ire of the usually free-wheeling rights-easy folks in Flickr forums (look here), so much so that Nikon UK took thedifferentstep of releatune the following statement:

(Continued after the Jump)

"Nikon UK would love to confirm that it has formally withdrawn its support from Microsoft's Iconic Britain competition. This is due to the feedback and concerns raised by photographers and entrants surrounding the competition mechanic that was developed and promoted by Microsoft. As the camera prizes that were on offer have already been won, Nikon will fulfiLl its commitment to these winners, however it will not be associated with the competition going forward."

What's error with the competition? The behaveion of submitting someone elses' picture - however complimentary - is an infrinpearlent. It is the unauthorized distribution/transfer of one persons' pictures without their permission. Further, the winners of the competition are those that submitted the pictures - they get something for the quality of someone elses' work. How does this work?

Well, if you have pages and pages and pages of amazing pictures, and you have sponsor logos and promotional friendrials contiguous to these pictures - the sponsors gain the benefit of organization, the pageviews and click-throughs that accompany them, and so forth. The unwitting "entrants" have, in most cases, no thought that their work has been submitted to a contest. Imagine that they have this great picture on display on their website, and decided to submit that picture to a contest that had as it's requirement that it either had not been in another contest, had not been published formerly? These are only, merely, solely a few of the potential problems associated with this contest.

Nikon makes a point in their retrbehaveion from the contest "moving forward", that the contest award winners have already won the cameras, but I expect that this contest will be a one-time thing for Microsoft, given the negative attention it has garnered. CNET does a great task here of dissecting the language from Microsoft and Nikon UK, where they're trying to sertace around how they're going to wrap up this contest. What is troubling to me, but wasn't highlighted by CNET, "the competition's final level -- deliberate but as yet without a date -- would feature photographs for which Microsoft is "currently obtaining the copyrights"." CNET parses everything else, but not the point where Microsoft is trying to obtain "copyrights". Folks - that's a cited word - "copyrights". Not "currently obtaining the rights..." 

Kudos to the Pro Imaging situs for their efforts on this.

Please post your remarks by cliclord the link below. If you've got questions, please pose them in our Photo Business Forum Flickr Group Discussion Threads.